Channel NewsAsia Forum Index Channel NewsAsia
www.channelnewsasia.com
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 Terms & Conditions

Are You Smarter Than A 12-Year-Old? (BlogTV on PSLE Maths)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Channel NewsAsia Forum Index -> Education
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JamesAng



Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 158

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

momoeagle wrote:
Students have a choice not to study in IP schools.

And SAT requirement for uni entries could be reverted, so why not IP?


Shocked

If you are a PSLE student today scoring 270, please honestly tell me if you will choose to go to RI which is IP or VS/Anderson/Xinmin/AHS/Chung Cheng to take O levels? I hope that you will choose not to go to RI based on your strong conviction. Btw I will choose RI if I score 270. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
momoeagle



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 5320

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Based on what I see now, I will indeed choose schools like Anderson Secondary or VS O level route, or if I'm a girl, St Nicks or CHIJ or NYGS, and then JCs like Yishun JC in the case of H2 Maths. Or SAJC for the wonderful preparation materials they have for their students.

In fact, my sis who was from Anderson is doing much better than most of my students from the IP stream. Much better means, she's among the top 10 in her school for H2 maths prelims, which I believe easily thrash every of my IP students. This, I credit to O levels for having trained her in her beliefs and study methodology. She did qualify to enter IP stream in lower sec, but in the end decided not to. Come to think of it, I believe it was a good choice.


What I have said is based on objectivity and hard data. A solid education is more important than a mere tag to your name.

IP is not for everyone. A levels and PSLE are very different things. Both are equally difficult for the students, but the training is radically different, and H2 breadth is much larger.


Last edited by momoeagle on Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:28 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JamesAng



Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 158

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

momoeagle wrote:
Based on what I see now, I will indeed choose schools like Anderson Secondary, and then JCs like Yishun JC in the case of H2 Maths. Or SAJC for the wonderful preparation materials they have for their students.

In fact, my sis who was from Anderson is doing much better than most of my students from the IP stream. Much better means, she's among the top 10 in her school for H2 maths prelims, which I believe easily thrash every of my IP students. This, I credit to O levels for having trained her in her beliefs and study methodology.


What I have said is based on objectivity and hard data. A solid education is more important than a mere tag to your name.


Shall I say that if you get 270 for PSLE today, you will choose Anderson Secondary and not RI? Your sister is good in her work, it is not surprising as she is among the best in AJC as you mentioned.

If everyone think like you, then RI/RGS will not be so crowded. Laughing


Last edited by JamesAng on Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:33 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
momoeagle



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 5320

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Subjectively, or let's say, if being kiasu, IP would be the choice. Why? I will be scared that I can't do well enough for O levels. Yet is this the type of mentality we want to instill?

Objectively, I would say the education through the O levels route is currently better.



Of course, IP stream would still have much to change and improve. Right now, it's over hyped and not as good as you think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JamesAng



Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 158

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

momoeagle wrote:
Subjectively, or let's say, if being kiasu, IP would be the choice. Why? I will be scared that I can't do well enough for O levels. Yet is this the type of mentality we want to instill?

Objectively, I would say the education through the O levels route is currently better.



Of course, IP stream would still have much to change and improve. Right now, it's over hyped and not as good as you think.


If you are good then why would you be scared? If you get 270, you will just say no to RI and go to Anderson. If IP is the way to go to get into top JC, then it is objective choice and not subjective.

Let's just say people are greedy by nature, they want to take O levels exam to get a cert but still guaranteed a place in a top JC even if they don't do as well in O levels. There is no such thing, yet. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
momoeagle



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 5320

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JamesAng wrote:
Shall I say that if you get 270 for PSLE today, you will choose Anderson Secondary and not RI? Your sister is good in her work, it is not surprising as she is among the best in AJC as you mentioned.

If everyone think like you, then RI/RGS will not be so crowded. Laughing
Crowded doesn't necessary mean that it is better. Basically, there's no point to use this fact that many PSLE students are selecting it to support yourself. What matters is whether you know what happens at the end of the IP journey? Have you done a research or survey on students on that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
momoeagle



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 5320

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JamesAng wrote:
If you are good then why would you be scared? If you get 270, you will just say no to RI and go to Anderson. If IP is the way to go to get into top JC, then it is objective choice and not subjective.

Let's just say people are greedy by nature, they want to take O levels exam to get a cert but still guaranteed a place in a top JC even if they don't do as well in O levels. There is no such thing, yet. Laughing
I noticed that you are still living in your own world since you do not teach the H2 syllabus to students.

Getting 270 in PSLE doesn't mean you will do well at O levels or A levels. You mentioned, if you are good, why would you be scared? True, if you are good, why would you be scared of not getting into top JCs through the O level route as well? Or even not scoring well by going YJC or AJC or ACJC? Why must it be RJ?

And by objectivity, I'm not referring to choices as you have misunderstood. I'm referring to education of oneself in general.

It's not about being greedy. As I have already told you but you refused to acknowledge, O levels trained you to prepare for major exams after PSLE.


No one looks at whether I was RI/RJ after my uni degree, other than when I teach tuition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JamesAng



Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 158

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

momoeagle wrote:
JamesAng wrote:
If you are good then why would you be scared? If you get 270, you will just say no to RI and go to Anderson. If IP is the way to go to get into top JC, then it is objective choice and not subjective.

Let's just say people are greedy by nature, they want to take O levels exam to get a cert but still guaranteed a place in a top JC even if they don't do as well in O levels. There is no such thing, yet. Laughing
I noticed that you are still living in your own world since you do not teach the H2 syllabus to students.

Getting 270 in PSLE doesn't mean you will do well at O levels or A levels. You mentioned, if you are good, why would you be scared? True, if you are good, why would you be scared of not getting into top JCs through the O level route as well? Or even not scoring well by going YJC or AJC or ACJC? Why must it be RJ?

And by objectivity, I'm not referring to choices as you have misunderstood. I'm referring to education of oneself in general.

It's not about being greedy. As I have already told you but you refused to acknowledge, O levels trained you to prepare for major exams after PSLE.


No one looks at whether I was RI/RJ after my uni degree, other than when I teach tuition.


I would call IP the "Expressway" path to University although some "cars" do sometimes break down along the way, but generally true that the drivers on the "Expressway" do not jostle with many drivers on the other roads to get to their destination University.

I would choose RI if I get 270 today in PSLE and I advise students likewise. You would prefer O levels schools if you get 270 and not choose RI (unless there is O levels in RI Rolling Eyes ).

I have seen many P6 students with aspirations to go into IP schools because of the well-rounded education they offer. I think it has become a "reward" system to motivate students to fulfil their aspirations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
momoeagle



Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 5320

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

James, you are still looking at the entry point of view (as you see it as a reward to PSLE students), while I'm talking about the end of the journey. But idealised visions are seen at the start of any journey, and actual results are only seen at the end of the journey. That's the difference.

I wouldn't call IP the expressway to uni as the number of years you take is still the same. You still have to jostle at A levels to get into Uni, but without having trained at jostling at O levels.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JamesAng



Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 158

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

momoeagle wrote:
James, you are still looking at the entry point of view (as you see it as a reward to PSLE students), while I'm talking about the end of the journey. But idealised visions are seen at the start of any journey, and actual results are only seen at the end of the journey. That's the difference.

I wouldn't call IP the expressway to uni as the number of years you take is still the same. You still have to jostle at A levels to get into Uni, but without having trained at jostling at O levels.


Both approaches when carried out carefully and systematically, can help the students get into the University. As long as the student gets into the University of their choice and do what they like, it will be their dream and aspirations come true. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Channel NewsAsia Forum Index -> Education All times are GMT + 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group